Oh yay title mother-fucking IX. I have some gripes with you. I need to make some posts on it.
• • •
The first one I do not agree with, but the last two are definitely some much needed changes. I mean, giving the accused the presumption of innocence? I must be going crazy because I thought that was a basic constitutional right. If anyone actually knows the definition of harassment, it’s on the second slide. Yeah, that is vague as SHIT. Whatever “offends” you is very subjective. This basically makes a random individual’s (particular women’s) word law. They could make harassment charges against for giving you a high five (I plan to get into that story in a different post). As long as the definition is narrowed to become more objective, I stand by that. • • •